![]() ![]() that Casey Newton 's reporting of Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter may have been the first way some ex-Twitter employees learned they were laid off? OR ALT3. In theory, Money Control could have verified the stories independently, but I would expect a line like "We independently verified that these were former Twitter employees who first heard about their being fired this way." How would a slight hook change be? ALT2. Cheers - Amakuru ( talk) 17:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC) The previously approved hook appears to be based on unreliable sourcing. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 00:55, 23 November 2022 SWinxy, Mandarax, Paul2520, Onegreatjoke, Theleekycauldron, and Cwmhiraeth: - I am reopening this nom per issues raised at WP:ERRORS (see ). Hook is interesting, sources seem good, and no QPQ is required. Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Y.Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems General: Article is new enough and long enough The intention in the hook is to say that the tweets by Newton were the tipoff to the employees learning that they were laid off, not just his reporting. ![]() Comment: First DYK nomination! I'm proud of the article.that Casey Newton had informed at least two Twitter employees that they had been laid off by tweets through his reporting of Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter? that through Casey Newton 's reporting of the acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk, at least two employees had learned that they had been laid off from his tweets? that Casey Newton 's reporting of Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter led to at least two employees learning through Newton's tweets that they were laid off? Source:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |